queer singaporean

While reading up on Straits Times Interactive today (which I absolutely regret paying for that damn service), I chanced upon the article on virginity by this girl called Lee Wan Yi.
Yes yes, we are from an Asian country, so asian values would mean having to keep your "first time" for your husband. That sounds more like a Male Chauvanist Pig value in my opinion actually. Nevermind about that, but it was what this NTU girl wrote that annoyed me a lil.

Here I quote,
"Virginity is the best gift a woman can present to her husband."

Er... Hello...? Knock knock? Are you stuck in the 1800s or something whereby your husband has to "poke" you on the night you get married and see if you'll bleed till the sheets get stained. THEN the next morning that pussy boy will bring the sheets to his mother and the whole family will rejoice in unison and acknowledge that the girl that just got fucked the night before is a virgin, and hence would be a virtuous wife and a good mother, good daughter-in-law and the list goes on.

The point is, this girl who just wrote to Straits Times has just demonstrated to the whole wide world (in my opinion) that it is important for a woman to let her husband have the first time? What about the husband? Does it mean that the guy is at liberty to screw around but not the girl? I don't have that much guy friends who are still a virgin, in fact some of them lose their virginity in NS when their friends drag them to Geylang for a good time and make sure that they LOSE it that instant.

It just pisses me off, what is the world coming to?

I mean really, I don't have a problem with virgins, neither do I have a problem with non-virgins. I'm pretty confused you see, in a heterosexual world, I'm still considered a virgin (or so my partner insist; edit: i didnt insist, just 'technically' you are still one but then again that is in the hetero point of view so whatever, fuck it la, literally) but not in a lesbian world. I have friends who are still virgins, and some others, in a monogamous relationship but are sexually active WITH their partners.

It's just so hypocritical and typical of the government to be like that. They believe the need for sexual education, but not prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Why so? Think about the Snowball party whereby there was a booth set up to distribute condoms in conjunction of promoting awareness for preventing AIDS. That booth was shut down by the police, and yeah, once again it was seen as promoting an alternative lifestyle just because it's a party of gays and lesbians. What about heterosexual people who's forever ONS-ing?

There're just so many arguements to why sometimes pre-marital sex is inevitable

Oh bugger, just remain monogamous la, problem solved.